A critical evaluation of Supply chain knowledge and a critical awareness of current supply chain problems and new thinking
management
Description
Learning Outcomes
1.
A critical evaluation of Supply chain knowledge
and a critical awareness of current supply chain problems and new thinking
2.
An in-depth and critical understanding and
identification of the key requirements and opportunities for supply chain
strategy.
3.
A comprehensive and critical evaluation of
analytical techniques applicable to supply chain analysis.
4.
Consideration of
how to structure, and manage a global logistics network
5.
Critically identify and evaluate the most
pressing challenges for logistics managers arising from the globalisation of
supply chains.
6.
Critically reflect on the nature of the new organizational
paradigm, looking at the new tools, methods and relationship management
strategies being developed to respond to the demands of a changing environment.
7.
Demonstrate originality in the application of
knowledge, together with a practical understanding of analytical and managerial
skills in order to apply this knowledge, within an overall business environment
in an integrated manner.
8.
Apply the tools and techniques for effective
supply chain management in a different markets
9.
An ability to critically evaluate and solve
complex supply chain problems both systematically and creatively, make reasoned
judgements in the absence of complete data
and communicate your conclusions clearly.
10. Preparing
and presenting proposals effectively
11. Demonstrate
self direction and originality in solving complex supply chain problems.
Assessment Overview
The final assessment for this module is an Individual coursework
assignment on Supply Chain Management (100%)
Note: appendices are not included in the word count for
this report. Format is a formal written report of
maximum word limit of 2500 words (word limit to be stated on the front cover)
including diagrams (e.g. organisation charts) and tables. Report should
comprise Title Page, Parts 1 – 3.
Also (not included in word
count): References (essential) and Appendices (if needed).
Key Components and Task:
|
•
‘The key
to real Customer Value is effective Supply Chain Management”.
•
Discuss the above statement, using one or two at
most, examples of real companies that have either achieved (or failed) to
deliver customer value via their chosen supply chain strategies.
•
|
The main objective of this assessment is to: enable students to
demonstrate knowledge of effective supply chain strategies in the pursuit of
customer value. Support this statement using real examples of companies
operating in today’s global competitive environment, showing the importance of
effective SCM strategies in successfully delivering customer value. •
Provide an in-depth critical analysis of the main argument – effective
supply chain strategies can deliver customer value (literature review). Examine research which has argued that SC
strategies can deliver customer value- with
examples
•
|
•
Short Conclusion.
Special Instructions:
•
Prepare an individual
assignment (no shared work).
•
SCM theory from course text and relevant Journal
publications is essential.
•
Full references and sources of all materials
must be stated
•
Use your
student ids for anonymity (i.e. no student names on the assignment itself).
•
Students are expected to access and utilise
academic articles which are accessible via the Brunel library homepage (e.g.
using the “e-Journals Gateway” or the “Emerald database”).
•
References should be taken in the main from
Journal publications. I will accept some web references, but I would like these
to be kept to an absolute minimum.
•
I would expect over 80% of references to come
from journal publications. The remaining >20% to come from web sites and
text books.
•
I would expect a minimum of 20 references for this assignment.
•
Please Note: You should also all be aware of the
University’s policy on Plagiarising. Anyone caught plagiarising will be dealt
with SEVERLY.
Submission deadline: 11:59 am UK time Thursday, 3 September 2020
Submission Method: via the WISEflow platform
Late submission rules: as per the University’s policy
Relevant Programme regulation: Senate Regulations 3
Provision of formative assessment: Not applicable.
Marking
criteria: attached (Annex I)
** All
submissions will be electronically checked for plagiarism. **
Helpful resources:
Annex I:
Brunel University Generic Masters-level Grade Descriptors
These generic grade descriptors
are intended to be used as a tool throughout the assessment process (in
assessment design, marking/grading, moderation, feedback and appraisal) for any
assessment set at Masters Level in the University. They are designed to show no
disciplinary bias and are not intended to act as surrogate award or award
classification descriptors. The grade descriptors should be read in conjunction
with the learning outcomes associated with the assessment.
Grade A++
Work of exceptionally high
quality, commensurate with publication in a highly esteemed peer-reviewed
journal. Clearly demonstrates a sophisticated, critical and thorough
understanding of the topic. Provides clear evidence of originality and clearly
demonstrates the ability to develop an independent, highly systematic and
logical or insightful argument or evaluation. Demonstrates exceptional ability
in the appropriate use of the relevant literature, theory, methodologies,
practices, tools, etc., to analyse and synthesise at Masters Level. Shows
exceptional clarity, focus and cogency in communication.
Grade Band A (A+, A, A-)
Clearly demonstrates a
sophisticated, critical and thorough understanding of the topic. Provides
evidence of originality of thought and clearly demonstrates the ability to
develop an independent, highly systematic and logical or insightful argument or
evaluation. Demonstrates excellence in the appropriate use of the relevant
literature, theory, methodologies, practices, tools, etc., to analyse and
synthesise at Masters Level. Shows excellent clarity, focus and cogency in
communication.
Grade Band B (B+, B, B-)
Clearly demonstrates a
well-developed, critical and comprehensive understanding of the topic. Clearly
demonstrates the ability to develop an independent, systematic and logical or
insightful argument or evaluation. Demonstrates a high degree of competence in
the appropriate use of the relevant literature, theory, methodologies,
practices, tools, etc., to analyse and synthesise at Masters Level. Shows a
high level of clarity, focus and cogency in communication.
Grade Band C (C+, C, C-)
Demonstrates a critical and
substantial understanding of the topic. Demonstrates the ability to develop an
independent, systematic and logical or insightful argument or evaluation.
Demonstrates a significant degree of competence in the appropriate use of the
relevant literature, theory, methodologies, practices, tools, etc., to analyse
and synthesise at Masters Level. Provides evidence of clarity, focus and
cogency in communication.
Grade Band D (D+, D, D-)
Provides evidence of some
critical understanding of the topic. Demonstrates some ability to develop a
structured argument or evaluation. Demonstrates an acceptable degree of
competence in the appropriate use of the relevant literature, theory,
methodologies, practices, tools, etc., to analyse and synthesise, but not at
Masters Level. Provides evidence of effective communication.
Grade Band E (E+, E, E-)
Work that demonstrates
significant weaknesses, but which provides strong evidence that Grade D is
within the reach of the student.
Grade F
Work that is unacceptable.
[Available
from intranet:
https://intra.brunel.ac.uk/s/QSO/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=/s/QSO/Handbook%2
0Text/Postgraduate%20grade%20descriptors.doc&action=default&DefaultItemOpen=1]
