Under employment at will by law and public policy you don't need a reason to terminate someone's employment.

business

Description

Underemployment at will, by law and public policy, you don't need a "reason" to terminate someone's employment. Why don't employers utilize the employment at will doctrine freely and use this flexibility to terminate those employees who they do not consider worthy of continued employment? It has been suggested that the laws should be changed to include obesity to be added to the list of characteristics considered to be discriminatory in employment law. The courts have upheld employers discriminating against smokers because of the increased health costs incurred by smokers. Could employers make the same argument discriminating against those individuals who are obese since they are subject to increased health risks associated with their condition? There are some people who may or may not perceive certain things as sexual harassment, but that doesn't mean that it does not exist. Where is the good balance between joking and going too far? Confidentiality is extremely important in these cases and employers attempt to maintain confidentiality to the best of their ability. However, is this possible in our age of instant communication and the internal "grapevine" that exists in every organization?

Instruction Files

Related Questions in business category


Disclaimer
The ready solutions purchased from Library are already used solutions. Please do not submit them directly as it may lead to plagiarism. Once paid, the solution file download link will be sent to your provided email. Please either use them for learning purpose or re-write them in your own language. In case if you haven't get the email, do let us know via chat support.