A thorough discussion of the use of force to accomplish the criminal act of rape may be found in Commonwealth v. Berkowitz, 641 A.2d 1161 (Pa. 1994). Defendant was convicted of rape after being involved in an alleged acquaintance rape situation in a colle

history

Description

A thorough discussion of the use of force to accomplish the criminal act of rape may be found in Commonwealth v. Berkowitz, 641 A.2d 1161 (Pa. 1994). Defendant was convicted of rape after being involved in an alleged acquaintance rape situation in a college dorm room. Defendant appealed his conviction. The appellate court reversed the defendant’s conviction and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed the reversal of defendant’s conviction. Jurisdictions require one of two standards in showing a use of force: Force requiring some act in addition to the physical effort required to accomplish the sexual penetration; or Simply that amount of effort required to accomplish the nonconsensual sexual penetration. Defendant was convicted using the latter standard, but the appellate courts believed that the Pennsylvania statute required the former standard. Please discuss the following: Do you believe that these two standards are a proper "test" for the Court's to use when determining if a rape occurred? Do you agree with the Court in this case made the proper determination and why? The case may be found at this link: scholar.google.com/scholar_case

Instruction Files

Related Questions in history category


Disclaimer
The ready solutions purchased from Library are already used solutions. Please do not submit them directly as it may lead to plagiarism. Once paid, the solution file download link will be sent to your provided email. Please either use them for learning purpose or re-write them in your own language. In case if you haven't get the email, do let us know via chat support.