Project introduction should a) establish the problem, b) provide an overview of existing research, c) identify a research gap, d) state a research question and e) establish the value of the project. All elements must be present in your introduction.
engineering
Description
Reviewer 1: Physical layout and logical
structure (Max score 2)
Your report should have a) Title page, b) Table of
contents, c) Page numbers, d) List of figures, e) List of tables, e) List of
figures, and f) Glossary as relevant to the project. The figures and tables
should be captioned. The report should be proofread, and there should be no
spelling mistakes or grammatical errors. The report should be easy to read and
presented accurately, concisely and coherently, with no errors.
Maximum
score
2
|
Reviewer 1: Abstract (Max score 3) Abstract should accurately and concisely capture the thesis topic,
background, aims/objectives, advances in the field and solution methodology,
main findings and conclusion of the work. Maximum score 3 |
|
Reviewer 1: Introduction (Max score 2) Project introduction should a) establish the problem, b) provide an
overview of existing research, c) identify a research gap, d) state a
research question and e) establish the value of the project. All elements
must be present in your introduction. Maximum score 2 |
|
Reviewer 1: Aims and Objectives (Max score 1) a) Aim(s) should define the overall purpose of the work. Maximum score 1 |
|
Reviewer 1: Literature Review (Max score 3) Literature should be critically analysed, evaluated and presented in a
logical and coherent manner with comments showing excellent ability to
synthesise and abstract knowledge. Previous works should be properly
acknowledged. Maximum score 3 |
|
Reviewer 1: Methodology (Max score 3) You should clearly articulate all the research tasks with sufficient
details. You should clearly demonstrate how the proposed methodology is
appropriate for the project. Maximum score 3 |
|
Reviewer 1: Results and Discussion (Max score 32) You should present your results in tables, graphs, figures as
appropriate for your results and interpret them on your body text. You should
recognise patterns and trends in your result and. All sources of error and
limitations of experimental/simulation/fieldwork/case study measurements
should be identified correctly. There should be no gap in the interpretation
of the results. Results should be thoroughly and logically discussed meeting
the project objectives. The results should be nicely linked with the
literature. The analysis should demonstrate a high level of independent
thought and critical thinking. Maximum score 32 |
|
Reviewer 1: Conclusion (4) Conclusions should be supported by the results. You should provide a
clear description of the relationship between the current findings and the
reviewed literature. It is also important that the possible applications or
implications of the findings are well discussed. You should demonstrate that
you have achieved your objectives and answered your research question. Maximum score 4 |
