The effects of the increase in Teen Suicide

psychology

Description

Part VI: Final Research Poster


Due: Sunday, end of Week 8 (95 points)


Submit in the Week 8 Learning Activities area


Description: Part VI represents the summation of all of your work this semester.  You are expected to have revised your poster based on the feedback you received from your classmates.



Grading Criteria: Final Research Poster


Points will be assigned based on how successful were you in these areas:


·        Clarity, Organization, & Content Knowledge: Were you able to succinctly but thoroughly covering the issues relevant to your chosen topic?  Did you demonstrate your ability to take your peers’ feedback and incorporate it into your project to make it better?


·        Critical Thinking and Originality of Thought:  Were you able to see the complex issue you chose from multiple viewpoints? Did you integrate the perspectives provided from multiple disciplines into your poster? Did you think critically about the complexity of the issue? Did you come up with viable solutions?


·         Writing Quality: Was your poster clearly written without typos or grammatical errors?  Does your paper make any of the mistakes found on the Guide for Good Writing?


Excellent


Good


Fair


Poor


Missing


Identifies an appropriate social problem


5 points


Clearly identifies an appropriate social problem


4 points


Identifies an appropriate social problem, with 1-2 minor omissions


3 points


Identifies an appropriate social problem, with several minor omissions


2 points


Does not clearly identify an appropriate social problem


0 points


Does not identify an appropriate social problem


Interdisciplinary approach to subject matter


15 points


Excellent interdisciplinary consideration of the topic. Clearly identifies at least 3 social science disciplines and integrates information effectively.


12 points


Good interdisciplinary consideration of the topic. Clearly identifies at least 2 social science disciplines and integrates information effectively, with some omissions


9 points


Fair interdisciplinary consideration of the topic. Clearly identifies at least 2 social science disciplines, but struggles to integrate information in an interdisciplinary fashion.


6 points


Poor interdisciplinary consideration of the topic. Identifies at least 1 social science discipline, but does not integrate information in an interdisciplinary fashion


0 points


No attempt to identify or integrate information across disciplines


Supported by empirical evidence


10 points


Incorporates at least 10 scholarly and empirically based articles


8 points


Incorporates at least 8 scholarly and empirically based articles


6 points


Incorporates at least 6 scholarly and empirically based articles


4 points


Incorporates at least 4 scholarly and empirically based articles


0 points


Incorporates less than 4 scholarly and empirically based articles or none at all


Policy Recommendations


15 points


Excellent recommendations. Proposes logical, appropriate, and relevant recommendations for improving current situation


12 points


Good recommendations. Proposes logical, appropriate, and relevant recommendations for improving current situation, but with some minor omissions.


9 points


Fair recommendations. Proposes recommendations for improving current situation, but with some failure of logic, appropriateness, or relevance.


6 points


Recommendations for improving current situation are unclear, illogical, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant.


0 points


No recommendations made


Organization of poster


15 points


Excellent poster organization – evidence of careful and deliberate placement of elements


12 points


Good poster organization – evidence of thoughtful placement of elements, but with 1-2 minor errors


9 points


Fair poster organization – evidence of thoughtful placement of elements, but with major errors


6 points


Poor poster organization – little to no evidence of thought or planning


0 points


Complete lack of organization


Visual Appeal


10 points


Visually appealing and easy to read.


8 points


Visually appealing and mostly easy to read.


6 points


Poster is visually uninteresting or visually distracting or difficult to read


4 points


Posted is visually uninteresting or distracting and is difficult to read


0 points


No submission


Writing quality


10 points


Free of mechanical and composition errors.


8 points


A few mechanical and composition errors that do not detract from the overall quality of the work


6 points


Several mechanical and composition errors that detract from the overall quality of the work.


4 points


Many distracting errors that significantly detract from the overall quality of the work.


0 points


Poster is unreadable or incomprehensible


Incorporates peer feedback into final poster


10 points


Effectively incorporates constructive feedback from peers into final poster


6 points


Incorporates some suggestions, but ignores others that may have improved the presentation


0 points


Does not incorporate constructive feedback, leaving presentation seriously in need of improvement


APA format


5 points


Correct use of APA format (in-text citations, references)


4 points


Mostly correct use of APA format with 1-2 minor errors (in-text citations, references)


3 points


Somewhat correct use of APA format with several minor errors (in-text citations, references)


2 points


Several major errors in use of APA format (in-text citations, references)


0 points


Does not use APA format


Stefanie,


More information in your draft would have allowed me to be more helpful.


In addition to my comments below - you need to work on your reference list.  It is not in APA formatting.  Go back and review APA and make revision before you submit your final project.  Please, do not have it in "bold" font as a start.



Identification of appropriate social problem: You are missing a clear research question.

Interdisciplinary approach to subject matter: While you have disciplines, your input on the poster is lacking analysis and critical thinking -- you need to give your analysis in these sections.

Supported by empirical evidence: While you have used some of your references, it appears that you have not integrated the majority into your presentation.

Policy recommendations: Lacking a "Recommendation" section on your poster

Instruction Files

Related Questions in psychology category


Disclaimer
The ready solutions purchased from Library are already used solutions. Please do not submit them directly as it may lead to plagiarism. Once paid, the solution file download link will be sent to your provided email. Please either use them for learning purpose or re-write them in your own language. In case if you haven't get the email, do let us know via chat support.