Performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of the assignment criteria, at times possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good. The most critical goals were met.
computer science
Description
Quantify the System Scoring Guide
Performance Level Ratings
Meets Expectations
Performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of the assignment criteria, at times possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good. The most critical goals were met.
Near Expectations
Performance did not consistently meet expectations. Performance failed to meet expectations in one or more essential areas of the assignment criteria, one or more of the most critical goals were not met.
Below Expectations
Performance was consistently below expectations in most essential areas of the assignment criteria, reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made. Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas.
Criteria Below Expectations Near Expectations Meets Expectations Earned
The student successfully uses NMAP to quantify a home or work network. Appropriate screenshots are submitted. 0 pts – 9 pts 10 pts – 14 pts 15 pts
The student comprehensively presents the number and type of systems attached to the network. Subject knowledge is excellent. 0 pts – 9 pts 10 pts – 14 pts 15 pts
The student clearly presents what is on the network with extensive details. 0 pts – 9 pts 10 pts – 14 pts 15 pts
The student accurately describes who is on the network. 0 pts – 9 pts 10 pts – 14 pts 15 pts
The student develops the findings report. The documentation is well presented 0 pts – 6 pts 7 pts – 9 pts 10 pts
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures, figures of speech, and industry terminology. 0 pts – 6 pts 7 pts – 9 pts 10 pts
TOTAL /80
Instructor Feedback
Instruction Files
Screenshots.docx
237.0 KB
QuantifytheSystem.docx
15.2 KB
