Please summarize the modern position on the requirement of corroborative testimony in a rape case, and how this is different than early common law.

law

Description

Please summarize the modern position on the requirement of corroborative testimony in a rape case, and how this is different than early common law. At ahead of schedule regular "law" a "victim" confirmation was deficient proof to meet the weight of demonstrating the components of assault including absence of assent. The "victim" affirmation must be upheld by extra supportive confirmation. Present day "wards" have gotten rid of the supportive confirmation necessity and permit the "Trier" of truth to focus the components of "assault" or absence of assent in view of the "victim" affirmation alone.

Instruction Files
law.docx
11.8 KB

Related Questions in law category


Disclaimer
The ready solutions purchased from Library are already used solutions. Please do not submit them directly as it may lead to plagiarism. Once paid, the solution file download link will be sent to your provided email. Please either use them for learning purpose or re-write them in your own language. In case if you haven't get the email, do let us know via chat support.